New front in wiper wars

Jan. 1, 2020
Robert Bosch LLC just opened a new front in the wiper wars.

Robert Bosch LLC just opened a new front in the wiper wars. The company filed a patent infringement case at the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) against numerous importers who sell aftermarket "beam" wiper blades in the U.S. branded by companies such as Valvoline, Goodyear, Michelin and RainEater. The Bosch complaint asks the Commission to bar importation of those products.

Bosch has been trying to obtain injunctions against some of these companies in U.S. federal courts, with some success. Bosch tells Aftermarket Business World: "The ITC complaint is an effort to speed up the process of getting an injunction against multiple infringing wiper suppliers."

Bosch aftermarket beam wiper blades are sold in aftermarket retail outlets under names such as ICON, Evolution, Marathon and Aerotwin. All these replacements are manufactured outside the U.S., as are the aftermarket wipers sold by U.S. distributors such as Cequent Consumer Products, RainEater, LLC, Pylon Manufacturing Corp., and Winplus North America, Inc. and others, all named in the ITC complaint. All those U.S. distributors import their blades from either South Korea or China.

Matthew Scruggs, industry analyst, Frost and Sullivan, says the market for aftermarket beam wiper blades was $420 million in 2010 and is estimated to grow to $621 million in 2011 as more OEMs use the beam blades, which are more expensive than conventional and snow blades. The beam market is dominated by Aamco and Trico, with Bosch's share at about 15-20 percent, according to Scruggs' estimation. Bosch declined to provide its market share.

The blades sold by the U.S. distributers named by Bosch in the ITC complaint are generally at the low-end of the price market, and account for somewhere around 5-7 percent of the beam market, explains Scruggs. "The actual scope of who would allegedly be violating the Bosch patents is not huge, so if Bosch were successful at the ITC it wouldn't turn the industry on its head. But it would be a significant event," he says.

The elimination of Korean- and Chinese-made beam wipers would probably be felt most significantly at smaller aftermarket stores in rural areas, which tend to carry less expensive items. But to the extent that stores such as Advance Auto Parts, a distributor of RainEater wiper blades, are no longer able to carry some cheaper beam imports, their customers may decide to go back to conventional or winter wiper blades because of price.

Shelly Whitaker, manager of public communications for Advance Auto Parts, declines to comment on the implications of the Bosch ITC complaint.

 

 

PAGE 2

 

Some of the U.S. distributors have already pulled back on sales of products mentioned in the Bosch ITC complaint. Chuck Tornabene, president, Pylon, says he does not sell Michelin and Dupont beam wiper blades anymore. Pylon has applied for a patent for its hybrid blade technology, which takes advantage of the benefits of a conventional blade, that is its superior tip-to-tip wiping ability, with the sleeker appearance of a beam blade, which also has better all-weather characteristics. Tornabene believes hybrids — not beam blades — are the future, and OEMs, especially the Asian auto manufacturers, are already using them.

Other U.S. distributors are continuing to try to expand sales. Lance Thornton, president of RainEater, which sells beam blades at Advance Auto Parts, Auto Value, Auto-Lab and other aftermarket retail locations, emphasizes his "frameless" wipers — frameless and beam are used interchangeably — do not infringe on Bosch patents.

Thornton argues that RainEater's strength is in its marketing, where its sponsorship of NASCAR events helps raise its profile and drive new customers to aftermarket retailers who carry RainEater blades. Last year, Thornton put the No. 47 NASCAR Sprint Cup Show Car driven by Bobby Labonte in a 25-foot trailer and pulled it with his 2011 Ford F-350 to five different Advance stores per week for six weeks through three different states.

Robert Bosch LLC just opened a new front in the wiper wars. The company filed a patent infringement case at the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) against numerous importers who sell aftermarket "beam" wiper blades in the U.S. branded by companies such as Valvoline, Goodyear, Michelin and RainEater. The Bosch complaint asks the Commission to bar importation of those products.

 

Bosch has been trying to obtain injunctions against some of these companies in U.S. federal courts, with some success. Bosch tells Aftermarket Business World: "The ITC complaint is an effort to speed up the process of getting an injunction against multiple infringing wiper suppliers."

Bosch aftermarket beam wiper blades are sold in aftermarket retail outlets under names such as ICON, Evolution, Marathon and Aerotwin. All these replacements are manufactured outside the U.S., as are the aftermarket wipers sold by U.S. distributors such as Cequent Consumer Products, RainEater, LLC, Pylon Manufacturing Corp., and Winplus North America, Inc. and others, all named in the ITC complaint. All those U.S. distributors import their blades from either South Korea or China.

Matthew Scruggs, industry analyst, Frost and Sullivan, says the market for aftermarket beam wiper blades was $420 million in 2010 and is estimated to grow to $621 million in 2011 as more OEMs use the beam blades, which are more expensive than conventional and snow blades. The beam market is dominated by Aamco and Trico, with Bosch's share at about 15-20 percent, according to Scruggs' estimation. Bosch declined to provide its market share.

The blades sold by the U.S. distributers named by Bosch in the ITC complaint are generally at the low-end of the price market, and account for somewhere around 5-7 percent of the beam market, explains Scruggs. "The actual scope of who would allegedly be violating the Bosch patents is not huge, so if Bosch were successful at the ITC it wouldn't turn the industry on its head. But it would be a significant event," he says.

The elimination of Korean- and Chinese-made beam wipers would probably be felt most significantly at smaller aftermarket stores in rural areas, which tend to carry less expensive items. But to the extent that stores such as Advance Auto Parts, a distributor of RainEater wiper blades, are no longer able to carry some cheaper beam imports, their customers may decide to go back to conventional or winter wiper blades because of price.

Shelly Whitaker, manager of public communications for Advance Auto Parts, declines to comment on the implications of the Bosch ITC complaint.

 

 

PAGE 2

 

Some of the U.S. distributors have already pulled back on sales of products mentioned in the Bosch ITC complaint. Chuck Tornabene, president, Pylon, says he does not sell Michelin and Dupont beam wiper blades anymore. Pylon has applied for a patent for its hybrid blade technology, which takes advantage of the benefits of a conventional blade, that is its superior tip-to-tip wiping ability, with the sleeker appearance of a beam blade, which also has better all-weather characteristics. Tornabene believes hybrids — not beam blades — are the future, and OEMs, especially the Asian auto manufacturers, are already using them.

Other U.S. distributors are continuing to try to expand sales. Lance Thornton, president of RainEater, which sells beam blades at Advance Auto Parts, Auto Value, Auto-Lab and other aftermarket retail locations, emphasizes his "frameless" wipers — frameless and beam are used interchangeably — do not infringe on Bosch patents.

Thornton argues that RainEater's strength is in its marketing, where its sponsorship of NASCAR events helps raise its profile and drive new customers to aftermarket retailers who carry RainEater blades. Last year, Thornton put the No. 47 NASCAR Sprint Cup Show Car driven by Bobby Labonte in a 25-foot trailer and pulled it with his 2011 Ford F-350 to five different Advance stores per week for six weeks through three different states.

About the Author

Stephen Barlas

Stephen Barlas has been a full-time freelance Washington editor since 1981, reporting for trade, professional magazines and newspapers on regulatory agency, congressional and White House actions and issues. He also does a column for Automotive Engineering, the monthly publication from the Society of Automotive Engineers. He covers the full range of auto industry issues unfolding in Washington, from regulatory rulings on and tax incentives for ethanol fuel to DOE research and development aid for electric plug-ins and lithium ion battery commercialization to congressional changes in CAFE standards to NHTSA safety rulings on such things as roof crush standards and data recorders.

Sponsored Recommendations

ADAS Applications: What They Are & What They Do

Learn how ADAS utilizes sensors such as radar, sonar, lidar and cameras to perceive the world around the vehicle, and either provide critical information to the driver or take...

Banking on Bigger Profits with a Heavy-Duty Truck Paint Booth

The addition of a heavy-duty paint booth for oversized trucks & vehicles can open the door to new or expanded service opportunities.

The Autel IA700: Advanced Modular ADAS is Here

The Autel IA700 is a state-of-the-art and versatile wheel alignment pre-check and ADAS calibration system engineered for both in-shop and mobile applications...

Boosting Your Shop's Bottom Line with an Extended Height Paint Booths

Discover how the investment in an extended-height paint booth is a game-changer for most collision shops with this Free Guide.