U.S. DOT's upgraded roof strength proposal addresses two-sided testing

Jan. 1, 2020
WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Department of Transportation hash issued a modification of its proposed new roof crush standard to request public input on whether both sides of a vehicle roof should be tested and meet minimum force

Untitled Document

WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Department of Transportation hash issued a modification of its proposed new roof crush standard to request public input on whether both sides of a vehicle roof should be tested and meet minimum forces.

If adopted, the two-sided testing would require manufacturers to design vehicle roofs that withstand at least 2.5 times the weight of the vehicle on both sides of the roof as an alternative to testing just one side. A proposal, announced in August 2005, would require auto makers to build vehicle roofs to withstand a force equal to 2.5 times the vehicle weight, as applied to only one side. The proposed roof strengthening would apply to vehicles weighing up to 10,000 pounds.

“Rollover crashes are among the most violent events on America’s highways, and although they constitute a relatively small number of overall crashes, they account for a disproportionate number of deaths — approximately 10,000 a year,” says U.S. Transportation Secretary Mary E. Peters. “This proposal will build on our efforts to improve vehicle safety, will save lives and will protect people from injury.”

Secretary Peters noted that the amended roof crush proposal is part of a comprehensive program to reduce rollover fatalities and injuries, and includes mandating new technologies such as Electronic Stability Control which can save an estimated 9,600 lives a year, as well as stronger door locks. She also noted that using seat belts remains the most effective way to prevent fatalities and injuries in all types of crashes, including rollovers.

Nicole Nason, administrator of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), said that the earlier roof crush proposal was being amended because extensive research conducted since August of 2005 indicates that the double-sided testing procedure is now a viable alternative approach to improve vehicle roof strength.

“We want the benefit of public comments on whether the one-sided or double-sided procedure would be the wisest approach to save lives and protect people from serious injury due to contact with collapsed roofs,” Nason says. She noted that NHTSA was releasing all the testing the agency has done since August 2005, including a series of one-and two-sided test results, as part of today’s supplemental proposal.

She added that the agency would seek comment over the coming 45 days before making a final decision. She also said that the agency plans to issue a final rule by the summer of 2008.

The proposal can be viewed at: http://www.nhtsa.gov/staticfiles/DOT/NHTSA/Rulemaking/Rules/Associated%20Files/216_SNPRM_final_version_Jan_16rev.pdf.

Sponsored Recommendations

Best Body Shop and the 360-Degree-Concept

Spanesi ‘360-Degree-Concept’ Enables Kansas Body Shop to Complete High-Quality Repairs

ADAS Applications: What They Are & What They Do

Learn how ADAS utilizes sensors such as radar, sonar, lidar and cameras to perceive the world around the vehicle, and either provide critical information to the driver or take...

Banking on Bigger Profits with a Heavy-Duty Truck Paint Booth

The addition of a heavy-duty paint booth for oversized trucks & vehicles can open the door to new or expanded service opportunities.

Boosting Your Shop's Bottom Line with an Extended Height Paint Booths

Discover how the investment in an extended-height paint booth is a game-changer for most collision shops with this Free Guide.