Federal vehicle safety inspection bill introduced

Jan. 1, 2020
WASHINGTON, D.C. – House Resolution 259 (the Michael Jon Newkirk Transportation Safety Enhancement Act of 2009), a bill to establish state safety inspection programs and national standards for state safety inspections of motor

WASHINGTON, D.C. – House Resolution 259 (the Michael Jon Newkirk Transportation Safety Enhancement Act of 2009), a bill to establish state safety inspection programs and national standards for state safety inspections of motor vehicles, has been introduced by Rep. Sheila Jackson-Lee, D-Texas, in the first week of the 111th Congress. The bill was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.

RELATED STORIES

“From 1966 to 1975 there were 31 safety inspection programs in U.S. states and the District of Columbia,” says Bob Redding, Washington D.C. representative of the Automotive Service Association (ASA). “When Congress passed the Highway Safety Act of 1976 it eliminated the authority of the U.S. Department of Transportation to mandate state inspection programs. Immediately, 10 states repealed their programs and we went from 31 to 21 programs overnight. Between 1976 and today we lost two more and we have 19 now. Two programs, in Missouri and North Carolina, are under attack every year by their legislators.”

Redding says ASA supports federal legislation mandating periodic motor vehicle safety inspection since so many states have no vehicle safety inspection program as well as inconsistent state standards for safety inspection programs in states that do have inspections. Redding also feels that the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) needs to do more.

“Missouri’s program is top-of-the-line,” says Redding. “They not only test but they evaluate the numbers and compare them with states that don’t have programs. Those are things that NHTSA should be doing. They should at least do a study to be able to show the value of these programs because when they’re attacked, the only information out there is from the private sector and not from the government. You need the weight of a federal study.”

To view the text of H.R. 259, visit ASA’s legislative Web site at www.TakingTheHill.com.

About the Author

Bob Bissler

Bob Bissler began his interest in the automotive industry as a teenager helping his brother work on drag race cars, and after high school he worked in his other brother's collision repair shop. He became part of the automotive aftermarket trade press in 1992, and has served on the editorial staffs of Engine Builder, ImportCar, Brake & Front End and BodyShop Business magazines. He is also the past editor of NASCAR Tech Magazine and Akron Magazine.

Sponsored Recommendations

ADAS Applications: What They Are & What They Do

Learn how ADAS utilizes sensors such as radar, sonar, lidar and cameras to perceive the world around the vehicle, and either provide critical information to the driver or take...

Banking on Bigger Profits with a Heavy-Duty Truck Paint Booth

The addition of a heavy-duty paint booth for oversized trucks & vehicles can open the door to new or expanded service opportunities.

The Autel IA700: Advanced Modular ADAS is Here

The Autel IA700 is a state-of-the-art and versatile wheel alignment pre-check and ADAS calibration system engineered for both in-shop and mobile applications...

Boosting Your Shop's Bottom Line with an Extended Height Paint Booths

Discover how the investment in an extended-height paint booth is a game-changer for most collision shops with this Free Guide.